Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:02:57 +0900 (JST) From: Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com> To: bapt@FreeBSD.org Cc: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Any reason to keep OpenOffice.org 2 in the tree? Message-ID: <20110920.140257.650619413058079829.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20110919150353.GB90102@azathoth.lan> References: <20110919150353.GB90102@azathoth.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Any reason to keep OpenOffice.org 2 in the tree? Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:03:53 +0200 > Hi, > > This is an open question, in particular direction of maho@ :) > > Do we really need to keep OpenOffice.org 2.* in the ports tree? No, please remove it. > it is vulnerable, right. > and I'm not sure we still have users for OpenOffice.org 2.x. But I may be wrong thanks -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/ http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110920.140257.650619413058079829.chat95>