From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Feb 22 22:33:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net (scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4A037B402; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 22:33:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0009.cvx40-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([216.244.42.9] helo=mindspring.com) by scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16eVk2-0007co-00; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 22:33:07 -0800 Message-ID: <3C773798.85318848@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 22:32:56 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer Cc: Chris Costello , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenPAM References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Julian Elischer wrote: > > I'll let DES answer that one... though have you looked at the > > Linux-PAM code? > > It was derived from Mr Tso's PAM code (unveiled at USENIX > a few years ago.) He was adamant it was Dual Licensed. > (at that time at least). I meant, have you made a qualitative comparison of the two code bases? That's what DES asked you to do, in the post you were replying to, when he asked for complaints. If you think this is not an improvement, or isn't simply change for the sake of change, then you should speak up, after you have looked at the code that's there, and the proposed replacement. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message