From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 07:00:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EEE16A4CE for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:00:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C9443D68 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:00:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) iAU70C3c022942 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:00:12 +1100 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1])iAU70BxP061912; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:00:12 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost)iAU70BDp061911; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:00:11 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:00:11 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20041130070010.GX79646@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <200411282144.56438.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20041128210746.GN32181@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> <200411282225.36617.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200411282225.36617.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help! bad filesystem summary trashes system X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:00:15 -0000 On Sun, 2004-Nov-28 22:25:29 +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: >> Have you tried telling fsck to use an alternate super block (-b option)? > >I found an alternate superblock at 128, but using it gives the same error. That's not promising but you could try one of the other alternates. Assuming you didn't specify any non-standard options when you (or sysinstall) created that partition, running "newfs -N " will report all the alternate superblocks. >> If it's just a glitch that's affected the primary super block, this >> should work. If the in-core data got corrupted and has been written to >> all the superblocks, you might need to play with a filesystem editor. > >Can you suggest such an editor (and possibly give some hints what exactly to >do with it)? Unfortunately, no. I thought there was something in ports but I can't find it now. You might need to write something yourself :-(. -- Peter Jeremy