From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 10:29:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FF91065683 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:29:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: from mail.procreditbank.bg (mail.procreditbank.bg [193.26.216.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AC408FC23 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:29:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: (qmail 84514 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2008 13:46:47 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO domino.procreditbank.bg) (10.0.0.15) by 192.168.1.3 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2008 13:46:47 +0300 In-Reply-To: <200807081136.31140.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: Mel MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0.2 September 26, 2006 From: Ivailo Tanusheff Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:29:00 +0300 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on DOMINO/BULGARIA/PROCREDITBANK(Release 7.0.2FP2|May 14, 2007) at 08.07.2008 13:29:17, Serialize complete at 08.07.2008 13:29:17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jails and IP Aliasing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:29:32 -0000 No, I am right. Try it yourself and you will see that solves the issue. I have several jails on different machines and this way the system works without any error or problem. Try it and see it :) Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Mel Sent by: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 08.07.2008 12:38 To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc Subject Re: Jails and IP Aliasing On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:13:04 Ivailo Tanusheff wrote: > Hi, > > I guess the problem is with your netmask and respectivly the broadcast > adrresses for the jails. > It should be: > > inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 > inet 10.0.1.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 > inet 10.0.1.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 You guess wrong. Aliases SHOULD (as in IETF RFC should) have 255.255.255.255 netmask. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"