From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 3 10:47:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from D2SI.COM (D2SI.COM [63.224.10.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4221508A for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2000 10:47:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajk@paw-in-eye.net) Received: (from ajk@localhost) by D2SI.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA13399; Mon, 3 Jan 2000 12:45:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ajk) From: Alec Kloss Message-Id: <200001031845.MAA13399@D2SI.COM> Subject: Re: x.x.x.x on pn0 but got reply on pn1 In-Reply-To: <3870E101.F8283C86@commercialmovers.com> from "James A. Mutter" at "Jan 3, 2000 12:48:49 pm" To: jmutter@commercialmovers.com (James A. Mutter) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 12:45:58 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG James A. Mutter said: > What's causing this? I'm getting an occasional kernel error complaining > that '111.222.333.444 is on pn0 but got reply on pn1' - > > pn0 = "inet 192.196.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0" > pn1 = "inet 207.XXX.X.XX netmask 255.255.255.248" > > Ideas? Need more info - let me know. > It looks very much like you've got two network cards plugged onto the same lan. I ran a box like this for several days until I got around to buying a second hub to make the private network truly private. It didn't seem to cause any problems. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message