From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Aug 29 18:31:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from norn.ca.eu.org (cr965240-b.abtsfd1.bc.wave.home.com [24.113.19.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD259151FE; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 18:31:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cpiazza@norn.ca.eu.org) Received: by norn.ca.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id C0ABF782; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 18:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 18:29:38 -0700 From: Chris Piazza To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: Steve Price , Chris Piazza , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: USE_QT2 in bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <19990829182938.D34749@norn.ca.eu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 06:14:32PM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > * From: Steve Price > > * # Err, misread that. It is not at all compatible with qt-1.4x > * > * Speaking of incompatible and repository copies... Does anyone > * but me think it would be a good idea to put this port in a > * directory like qt200 instead of qt2, since we've had a history > > Great idea. I was going to suggest this myself after getting Chris's > response, but you beat me to it. :) > > So, what's it going to be? It's qt-2.0.1 now, so is qt201 ok, Chris? That's great. -Chris -- cpiazza@home.net cpiazza@FreeBSD.org "It's better to be quotable than to be honest." --Tom Stoppard To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message