From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 13:53:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C63B97F for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-1.ln-01-jnb.za.seacomnet.com [105.28.96.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91092A67 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=the-host.localnet) by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr5gn-0007oM-IK; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:52:57 +0200 From: Mark Tinka Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu Organization: SEACOM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update - 10.0 to 10.1 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:52:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-24-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; i686; ; ) References: <201411170840.06373.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> <201411191003.56313.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> <20141119053522.3d0cbcf6@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20141119053522.3d0cbcf6@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1580131.UdAKWvs6oP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201411191552.56159.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> Cc: Jerry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:53:05 -0000 --nextPart1580131.UdAKWvs6oP Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday, November 19, 2014 12:35:22 PM Jerry wrote: > I had the exact same problem yesterday. I waited a full > 30 minutes before doing a manual shutdown. I thought I > was the only one with that issue or else I would have > filed a PR against it. I am assuming that you have filed > one Mark. No, Jerry. Have not yet filed a PR. Grateful if you could file one. Beer on me when I'm in your=20 parts, Jerry :-). Thanks. Mark. --nextPart1580131.UdAKWvs6oP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUbKC4AAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GWCIP/AsXSprrW0iOWjKG0rhBDPXD ww7UJBOvYneJCQB4htIwJNGiqpTgPnZ0zxYLg+IZgB+pGJKGtQvD88SNYOX5amDG DGTeDz9hxLRIAHe/WkiTl1N1C3WS9xYxCXjusHO+L19ryq2d9gHdALea2xGmkON9 AqqpMgTZVE5f2NX/aExHuUTYYApDmQyt6I7PgOWn7caIXTci76IUwVilg8NSYY2M 9yAb3tSb+tFI0JD4jomvud5CVN/r5R9K1QLg6qTHjTOxn+4SCA7C+DyZoFqLiFcz hjoyPyG4N5YvBKcRto/TgLSc8jlC3FYRYvVrV5ElR23IazVsZvQuzkQiW2V68bl3 Q10ctiYf/GxlP8ca2ds4cZmVAmTezFC13A6V8IVNrtsCTHSNJGT1Jk93jDHnLc8T qFFk5Ys67C5xHPQkBZ35ct1lxG/vuDsU9nUXllFYUobcf43N/iNXtdZJq16WlYCZ s2FG2hn5C5sCF802V54lsL1Sopg/i8zllIu5TDibkUK/94X6Ansn3ocZpsDuiNTV PE6vUjvyeQl7P4QVD6i0D4jq4JT20Xq80d+z5ufz9m9culBu4SuK/O0Ujj9ZePO9 bek5Xf6lwMACFbDI7roDTk9bWzff6pr+QnLjbAmPD03UpVRDs6t0Nt0krOiAQoxg ngiIUDCRLEsaqhzcYdk5 =Et61 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1580131.UdAKWvs6oP--