From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  9 00:46:36 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E8F37B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  9 Apr 2003 00:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A769743FE0
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  9 Apr 2003 00:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h397jCZq030857;
	Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:45:12 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Apr 2003 02:38:29 EDT."
             <20030409023754.P92580@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> 
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 09:45:12 +0200
Message-ID: <30856.1049874312@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: systat -v on -CURRENT 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 07:46:37 -0000

In message <20030409023754.P92580@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>, Andre Guibert de 
Bruet writes:
>
>I just spotted this today...
>
>Disks   ad4   ad6  acd0                   ofod            intrn
>KB/t   0.00  0.00  0.00                   %slo-z   114272 buf
>tps       0     0     0                   tfree        13 dirtybuf
>MB/s   0.00  0.00  0.00                             70224 desiredvnodes
>% busy  -0.   -0.     0                              1046 numvnodes


Yeah, I saw that too.  It's a rounding error.  If you dive into it you
will see that the number is incredibly close to zero.

We should probably catch that in libdevstat.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.