Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Jun 1996 10:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
To:        michaelv@HeadCandy.com (Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com)
Cc:        gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org, sef@kithrup.com, smp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Unix/NT synchronization model (was: SMP progress?)
Message-ID:  <199606051720.KAA16854@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <199606050511.WAA25213@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> from "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" at Jun 4, 96 10:11:36 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote:
> Which is why I want to see how it's done in a modern Unix.  Maybe
> there's a "better" way.  Or, at least a more "standard" way.  It would
> be kinda dumb to put together a bunch of sync stuff that looks like
> NT, nice as it might be, when everything else written for an MP or
> threaded Unix works totally different.  I don't want to be locked into
> an NT paradigm.

	SunExpert magazine did a four article series on threads beginning
	with the feb '96 issue.  the last article in the series (may '96)
	compares pthreads with solaris threads.

	its all api level stuff

jmb
--
Jonathan M. Bresler           FreeBSD Postmaster             jmb@FreeBSD.ORG
FreeBSD--4.4BSD Unix for PC clones, source included. http://www.freebsd.org/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606051720.KAA16854>