From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Dec 4 13: 7:32 2000 From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 4 13:07:30 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A91937B400; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:07:30 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA57449; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 16:07:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 16:07:26 -0500 From: Michael Lucas To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: Nik Clayton , doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: troubleshooting tree revisited Message-ID: <20001204160726.A57428@blackhelicopters.org> References: <45668.975961838@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <45668.975961838@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 12:30:38PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, I suppose I'd evaluate it according to my criteria earlier in this thread. ;) Seriously, sure. I'm completely open for tools if there's a vague consensus on -doc that it's the proper tool for the job. On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 12:30:38PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > You know, I think this just might work. Thanks! > > That seems a bit laborious to follow, however, whereas an interactive > decision tree type program would at least make it more of a > click-n-drool type of experience. If I write the program which > creates and walks the decision tree, would you consider using it? :) > > - Jordan -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ Big Scary Daemons: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message