From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun Feb 23 10:49:52 1997
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA24927
          for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 23 Feb 1997 10:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mpp@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA24912;
          Sun, 23 Feb 1997 10:49:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Mike Pritchard <mpp>
Message-Id: <199702231849.KAA24912@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: bin/2692
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner)
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 10:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Cc: henrich@msu.edu, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <97Feb23.103420pst.177476@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at Feb 23, 97 10:34:14 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Bill Fenner wrote:
> 
> Mike Pritchard <mpp@freefall.freebsd.org> wrote:
> >Duplicate of PR# 1910.  However, in this case, find is
> >doing as it should: reporting "expoitable" file names that
> >would have been handed off to xargs.
> 
> What about "find -print0 | xargs -0"?  I thought these were implemented
> in response to the PR; were the appropriate scripts modified to use the
> new flags?

No, /etc/security was not changed to take advantage of this.
Sigh...
-- 
Mike Pritchard
mpp@FreeBSD.org
"Go that way.  Really fast.  If something gets in your way, turn"