From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Jul 27 8:40: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA1137BE82 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id IAA44670; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200007271540.IAA44670@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: kern/19726: fatal trap 12 / page fault Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/19726; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: Stas Kisel Cc: jblaine@linus.mitre.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/19726: fatal trap 12 / page fault Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:24:54 +0200 On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:57:02 +0300, Stas Kisel wrote: > Unfortunately, I don't have backtrace, probably because I've failed to select > correct swap size at setup time, or because I've failed to run dumpon > correctly. Waahoo. Your dmesg(8) output looks interesting. Check this out: > pci0: (vendor=0x1050, dev=0x0940) at 15.0 irq 11 > rl0: port 0xe400-0xe4ff mem 0xfebeff00-0xfebeffff irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0 > rl1: port 0xe000-0xe0ff mem 0xfebefe00-0xfebefeff irq 11 at device 17.0 on pci0 Notice in particular the IRQ reserved for both pci0 and rl1, both with _different_ PCI device IDs. :-) Jeff doesn't seem to have this problem, however. Nevertheless, something weird is definitely going on. Somebody give me a backtrace with debugging symbols and we'll send this to Bill. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message