From owner-cvs-all Mon Jan 6 10:41:54 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA39337B401; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 10:41:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5519143EC2; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 10:41:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with SMTP id h06Ifl1Z098312; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:41:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:41:46 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Thomas Moestl , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin Makefile In-Reply-To: <20030106052848.GH33821@elvis.mu.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Thomas Moestl [030105 14:39] wrote: > > tmm 2003/01/05 14:38:58 PST > > > > Modified files: > > usr.sbin Makefile > > Log: > > Build pppctl on sparc64, now that we have libc_r. > > Shouldn't archs like sparc64 and ia64 implicitly just define NOLIBC_R so > that this specific hack can be removed? There don't appear to be any of those architectures left since both ia64 and sparc64 gained libc_r support in the last 48 hours (except perhaps ppc), but that sounds like the right approach. :-) Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message