From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Aug 22 19:35:33 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA06851
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from pcpsj.pfcs.com (harlan.fred.net [205.252.219.31])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA06845
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com)
Received: from mumps.pfcs.com [192.52.69.11] (HELO mumps.pfcs.com)
	by pcpsj.pfcs.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) via ESMTP
	id <WAA14620-Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>;
	Sat, 22 Aug 1998 22:33:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from brown.pfcs.com [192.52.69.44] (HELO brown.pfcs.com)
	by mumps.pfcs.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) via ESMTP
	id <TAA01427-harlan@pfcs.com>;
	Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] (HELO brown.pfcs.com)
	by brown.pfcs.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) via ESMTP
	id <WAA20093-harlan@pfcs.com>;
	Sat, 22 Aug 1998 22:33:46 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net>
cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Alexander Sanda <entropy@compufit.at>,
        wwoods@cybcon.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: gcc 2.8 
In-Reply-To: Alex's (garbanzo@hooked.net) message
	dated Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:15:42.  <Pine.BSF.4.00.9808221903001.2174-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> 
X-Face: "csXK}xnnsH\h_ce`T#|pM]tG,6Xu.{3Rb\]&XJgVyTS'w{E+|-(}n<m88'RZQA.<2]zo&R
 I8nHuPumSNjsAN&WGhll?v}1#%)~2%QI~4Vs%IuWb#OmZmKck_1Ee&C\k&vJ}BWx:Bb#Mx8>:c(Cc*
 $cbtusxDP6T)Hr'k&zrwq0.3&~bAI~YJco[r.mE+K|(q]F=ZNXug:s6tyOk{VTqARy0#axm6BWti9C
 d
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 22:33:46 -0400
Message-ID: <20089.903839626@brown.pfcs.com>
From: Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

While it's been several months since I last did a performance comparison 
between TenDRA and gcc/egcs, I remember that the TenDRA-compiled code was 
significantly slower than the code produced by gcc or egcs.

I could be mistaken.

OTOH, I have some code that uses some "extensions" provided by gcc (labels 
as values) that I just haven't figured out how to get TenDRA to compile.  
It's no big deal if this code won't compile with TenDRA - it would just 
give me another set of routines where I could do a performance test.

I think I'll try compiling another package with TenDRA that has a "useful" 
benchmark.  I'll let folks know if I learn anything new.

H



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message