Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:07:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Policy for removing working code Message-ID: <slrni8hqgc.2rb2.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net> References: <201009011653.o81Grkm4056064@fire.js.berklix.net> <201009080842.28495.jhb@freebsd.org> <slrni8f5pi.2k1s.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net> <201009081021.48077.jhb@freebsd.org> <4c88993e.MgMUYIGSfJIxECy9%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4C88AA05.5050909@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Andriy Gapon! On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:33:57 +0300; Andriy Gapon wrote about 'Re: Policy for removing working code': >> Good, perhaps even "necessary", but is it "sufficient"? Those >> following a -STABLE branch are expected to read stable@, but >> what about those who are following a security branch? > People, who care, are expected to read current@ and stable@ even if they use > only releases and security branches. At the very least, to see what's cooking > up for them and what to expect. Hey, by whom expected? They are NOT expected to do this! Can you quote some official docs or statements for this? > P.S. I am surprised that this thread isn't over yet and is being kept alive by > people who do not seem to use the feature in question or offer any work on it. > While people, who really need it, have already found a way forward for themselves. Because this thread is not about this feature but about policy which will slowly bring FreeBSD project to troubles if nothing will be changed. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrni8hqgc.2rb2.vadim_nuclight>