Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:48:16 -0700
From:      Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@atg.aciworldwide.com>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Idea for project: Make cpp do unifdef service... 
Message-ID:  <200111051848.fA5ImG0H012663@atg.aciworldwide.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>  of "Mon, 05 Nov 2001 19:18:22 %2B0100." <76508.1004984302@critter.freebsd.dk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Concidering that cpp is vendor software, there would need to be a strong
> >case for it.  What is wrong with just fixing unifdef(1) itself?
> 
> Nothing, apart from the fact that it would be much more work.
> 
> I'm pretty sure that it would be possible to get the GCC crew to
> adopt a patch which added functionality to cppp.

Where does this leave people using alternate C compilers (e.g lcc)?


--lyndon

Lizzie Borden took an axe,
And plunged it deep into the VAX;
Don't you envy people who
Do all the things YOU want to do?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111051848.fA5ImG0H012663>