From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 12:24:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BFD16A4CE for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:24:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [81.56.186.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A092743FE1 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:24:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1BC6D752D; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:21:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:21:36 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031111202136.GA40106@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <1068458390.38101.19.camel@dirk.no.domain> <20031110152000.622db381.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <1068471598.38101.77.camel@dirk.no.domain> <20031110163623.GC93583@procyon.firepipe.net> <1068495958.690.72.camel@leguin> <53EC784E-13C5-11D8-AD24-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <3FB00E53.8060603@fillmore-labs.com> <20031111021929.GA17050@xor.obsecurity.org> <73E9F604-1472-11D8-BD31-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <73E9F604-1472-11D8-BD31-003065ABFD92@mac.com> X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-RC i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Subject: Re: Ability for maintainers to update own ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:24:03 -0000 Le Mar 11 nov 03 à 19:11:21 +0100, Charles Swiger écrivait : > Branching the ports collection is not a helpful solution to the problem > of speeding up the rate at which ports are committed. I agree: we don't need branching. The GNATS PR database may be used as a kind of "untested" branch. It's already possible to search for a port from , to grab the shar files or the patches, to test them, and then to report the results of these tests. A reviewed PR might be committed faster. -- Th. Thomas.