From owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Tue Jan 12 17:58:10 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2A04E0DB0 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFdbQ0Y9Kz4QrY for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 12C704E110B; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gnome@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128ED4E110A for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DFdbP72m4z3wVW for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E53FB10AC for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10CHw9ll076876 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:58:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 10CHw9fh076875 for gnome@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:58:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 252379] Mk/Uses/compiler.mk: remove USE_GCC=yes for compiler:openmp due to libomp.so is part of base since 11.3/12.1 Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:58:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: jrm@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? exp-run? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:58:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D252379 --- Comment #36 from Joseph Mingrone --- (In reply to Christoph Moench-Tegeder from comment #35) Thanks. I'll use a similar patch to fix the amd64 build. This one will probably be acceptable upstream. if(CLANG AND APPLE) link_directories(${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/libmac) - elseif (WIN32 OR UNIX) + elseif (WIN32 OR UNIX AND NOT ${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} STREQUAL "FreeBSD") if (BINARY32) link_directories(${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/lib32) else() Switching to clang++ does break i386 builds because base clang doesn't have= 64 bit atomic functions for i386 (see bug 230888). I'll probably just mark i386 broken, but if there is a single user running iqtree on i386, then I'll investigate further. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=