From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Jan 10 15:42:35 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au (bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au [130.102.2.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075B314DEB
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 15:42:28 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from s350738@student.uq.edu.au)
Received: from student.uq.edu.au (s350738@student.uq.edu.au [130.102.2.20])
	by bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA29416
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:38:28 +1000 (GMT+1000)
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:38:28 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: Rhys Arkins <s350738@student.uq.edu.au>
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: changing global structs
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0001110933351.16861-100000@student.uq.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Would there be any detrimental effects of adding an extra field to a
global struct such as the ifnet struct, so long as I added it as the
last field and did a full recompile of everything? I am looking into
adding an extra flags field to the ifnet struct.

thanks,
Rhys.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message