From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 00:09:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB79106566C for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbsd@isgroup.com.ua) Received: from mail.standard.com.ua (mail.isgroup.com.ua [46.229.54.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCD58FC08 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unused-213.111.71.69.bilink.ua [213.111.71.69] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.standard.com.ua (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5L02KCc048763 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:02:20 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from mbsd@isgroup.com.ua) From: mbsd To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <55037.1339092559@speakeasy.net> References: <55037.1339092559@speakeasy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:09:26 +0300 Message-ID: <1340237366.2098.15.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=9.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.isgroup.com.ua Subject: Re: paths of ruby, python, perl... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:09:44 -0000 You can use portupgrade -r[R] your_package. Or portupgrade -f `pkg_glob 'p5-*'` after upgrade your main package or something else (perl-after-upgrade). On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 11:09 -0700, jsb.__@speakeasy.net wrote: > Each time I've upgraded ruby, python, and perl I've encountered > lengthy = reinstalls of the port files (p5-...) as well as > higher-level > > programs which depend upon them. (Many pkg_which oneliners to parse. ..) This could be simplified if those /lang/ ports > > were all-in-= one-dir (like /perl/ rather than > > perl > > site_perl/5,10 > > site= _perl/5.12 > > /5.10 > > /5.12 > > etc... > > Maybe someone knows i= f such a path reconfiguration would break some > upstream non-BSD standard... > Thanks. > > J. Bouquet > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"