From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 13 22:46:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E1516A4CE for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:46:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BE8643D45 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:46:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 10950 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2005 22:41:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 13 Feb 2005 22:41:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 15361 invoked by uid 89); 13 Feb 2005 22:49:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Feb 2005 22:49:47 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CA011497 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:46:01 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:46:01 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050214004601.0150177a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <65856299.20050213233912@wanadoo.fr> References: <420FCA6C.7070604@makeworld.com> <1987008862.20050213232914@wanadoo.fr> <65856299.20050213233912@wanadoo.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: An observation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:46:05 -0000 On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:39:12 +0100 Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Anthony Atkielski writes: > > > I put it that way in my reply template, since I normally reply to the > > list, and not to the individual poster, and I get tired of cutting and > > pasting the correct address. BTW, there's enough MUAs that allow one to map keys combinations to reply-all, reply-list, reply-sender. > Actually, that's something different. > > My reply template directs the reply to the list, rather than to the > sender, so that I don't have to change the destination address for every > post (I never send replies to list messages to the original poster, > since that creates a lot of overhead for the original poster and a lot > of duplicated text for the reply). So you choose to disobey more that one thing from our mailing lists rules :-( -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"