Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:21:28 +0900 From: poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Bartosz Fabianowski <freebsd@chillt.de>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umass regression Message-ID: <86r4zagqyv.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201201031815.32624.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <4EF9D06C.9060501@chillt.de> <201201031726.03885.hselasky@c2i.net> <4F03317D.6080702@chillt.de> <201201031815.32624.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:15:32 +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > The following transaction shows that the device supports two luns. I suspect > that there is a miscommunication between UMASS and CAM layer. Hi, I have posted about the same issue some days ago to -scsi@. http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r4zkx50t.wl%poyopoyo To: FreeBSD-scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Garmin Edge705: LUN1 of umass device not recognized I follow your suspicion as I figured out this regression happened at r208911, modification to LUN discovery code. -- kuro
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r4zagqyv.wl%sf>