From owner-freebsd-current Sat Sep 16 09:09:05 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id JAA06473 for current-outgoing; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 09:09:05 -0700 Received: from server.netcraft.co.uk (server.netcraft.co.uk [194.72.238.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA06466 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 09:09:02 -0700 Received: (from paul@localhost) by server.netcraft.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA03192; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 17:08:06 +0100 From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199509161608.RAA03192@server.netcraft.co.uk> Subject: Re: libforms - thumbs up or down? To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 17:08:06 +0100 (BST) Cc: paul@FreeBSD.org, current@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199509151812.UAA21610@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Sep 15, 95 08:12:10 pm Reply-to: paul@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 538 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to J Wunsch who said > > Sorry, libdialog was it actually: > How are you getting libdialog linked with libforms? I guess there's no reason not to have this be possible but it was not intended to be that way. Libforms is meant to ultimately replace libdialog. The example certainly doesn't link with libdialog, are you trying to use something you've knocked together yourself? -- Paul Richards, Netcraft Ltd. Internet: paul@netcraft.co.uk, http://www.netcraft.co.uk Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1225 447500 (work)