From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Jan 8 15:20:08 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA10184 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 15:20:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA10179 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 15:20:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id PAA06023; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 15:20:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 15:20:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199901082320.PAA06023@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG From: Assar Westerlund Subject: Re: kern/9359: implement support for adding syscalls in KLD modules Reply-To: Assar Westerlund Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/9359; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Assar Westerlund To: Doug Rabson Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/9359: implement support for adding syscalls in KLD modules Date: 09 Jan 1999 00:11:10 +0100 Doug Rabson writes: > > Add adding support for `-p' in kldload with something that walkes the > > list for the newly added kld_file_stat with `kldfirstmod' and > > `modfnext' and calls a script with a list of the indexes and calling > > the script with these? > > Sounds good - I'll tackle that at the same time. You mean I should wait instead of implementing it myself? :-) /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message