From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Feb  5 13:29:41 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA13139
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 13:29:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (bmcgover-pc.cisco.com [171.69.104.147])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13120;
          Wed, 5 Feb 1997 13:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (bmcgover@localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with ESMTP id QAA00718; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 16:26:58 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199702052126.QAA00718@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com>
To: dg@root.com, support@freebsd.org
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Stomp the bug!!!! (Was cyclades bug)
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1997 16:26:57 -0500
From: Brian McGovern <bmcgover@cisco.com>
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Boy, I hate when things are obvious.

The line:

outw(ioport + CY_PLX_ICS, inw(CY_PLX_ICS) | 
	CY_PLX_ICS_IENABLE | CY_PLX_ICS_LOCAL_IENABLE);

is wrong. The inw doesn't have the ioport offset, and should read:

outw(ioport + CY_PLX_ICS, inw(ioport + CY_PLX_ICS) | 
	CY_PLX_ICS_IENABLE | CY_PLX_ICS_LOCAL_IENABLE);


Otherwise, the inw doesn't read from the same register as you outw to. If
someome would like me to diff this up, let me know. Otherwise, I'll assume
the change will get committed?

Gee, I feel good. My first bug fix.

	-Brian