From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jun 30 7: 2:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0848937C5BE for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:02:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id HAA18199; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:00:37 -0700 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda18197; Fri Jun 30 07:00:22 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id HAA50825; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdp50800; Fri Jun 30 06:59:54 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.10.2/8.9.1) id e5UDxrW07592; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 06:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006301359.e5UDxrW07592@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdXa7588; Fri Jun 30 06:59:52 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE X-Sender: cy To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" Cc: Chuck Robey , Garance A Drosihn , Will Andrews , papowell@astart.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: was: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:22:33 CDT." <20000630082233.B90316@spawn.nectar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 06:59:52 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000630082233.B90316@spawn.nectar.com>, "Jacques A. Vidrine" write s: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 09:18:34AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > > Also, LPRng requires gmake. Going to be a nice bit of work, bmaking that > > fellow. > > LPRng includes a Makefile.bsd (albiet a stale one). That perhaps > provides a fighting chance. Lets replace bmake with gmake in the base system. Gmake is more popular and used in RedHat. Just kidding :) (It's virtually the start of a long weekend here and I couldn't resist, sorry). Seriously, you're right, bmaking the Makefile is going to be an unpleasant task. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/DEC Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message