From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 17 22:48:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8895216A4D2 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:48:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail5.speakeasy.net (mail5.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A86643D49 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:48:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 24529 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 22:48:30 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 17 Nov 2004 22:48:30 -0000 Received: from [10.50.41.235] (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAHMmLft093124; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:48:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: Andrew Gallatin Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:24:10 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20041109225940.GA12940@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20041110050258.44554.qmail@web53105.mail.yahoo.com> <20041117151848.B780@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20041117151848.B780@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411171724.10708.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on server.baldwin.cx cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek cc: Matthew Jacob cc: Scott Long cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Wilko Bulte Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/conf GENERIC X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:48:31 -0000 On Wednesday 17 November 2004 03:18 pm, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > Matthew Jacob [mjacob44@yahoo.com] wrote: > > My opinion, FWIW, is to put Alpha in the class of machines that is > > supported by NetBSD, i.e., the hobby architectures. > > I agree. Its sad, but I think we should remove alpha from HEAD. > The main reason for holding on through the 5.x changes was to get > alpha SMP support in a released version of FreeBSD. We have that now, > in 5.x I won't stand against it, but I do actually do testing on the DS20 I have here. Unfortunately my jhb_preemption branch with a kernel with 4BSD + PREEMPTION locked up during a buildworld loop last night. *sigh* -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org