From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 26 18:02:31 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA21866 for stable-outgoing; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 18:02:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.intercenter.net (mir.intercenter.net [207.211.128.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA21851 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 18:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 16355 invoked from network); 27 Aug 1997 01:02:11 -0000 Received: from ct1-11.intercenter.net (HELO oz.intercenter.net) (207.211.129.44) by mir.intercenter.net with SMTP; 27 Aug 1997 01:02:11 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 21:01:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Ron Bickers To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2-STABLE In-Reply-To: <199708262311.IAA01715@word.smith.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > So, although I have yet to read something to the effect of "the RELENG_2_2 > > branch IS FreeBSD-stable", it sure looks that way to me. > > > > Please correct me if I'm wrong. > > It would be more correct to say that 2.2-STABLE is the current state of > the RELENG_2_2 branch. Thanks. Would someone who knows more about the label "FreeBSD-stable" include the details on where it comes from in the FreeBSD-stable section of the handbook? There may be less confusion over where this "stable" branch (that isn't actually named 'stable') is found. Sound reasonable? --- Ron