From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 03:50:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0595F106566B for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D118FC17 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1O3o4VM022434 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:50:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n1O3o4G8022433; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:50:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:50:04 GMT Message-Id: <200902240350.n1O3o4G8022433@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org From: rob@debank.tv Cc: Subject: Re: bin/131800: [jail] rpcbind(8) fails to start in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rob@debank.tv List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:50:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/131800; it has been noted by GNATS. From: rob@debank.tv To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, rob@debank.tv Subject: Re: bin/131800: [jail] rpcbind(8) fails to start in jail Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:28:13 +1300 (NZDT) > From the jail side this should have been fixed with the latest MFC > from jamie@ . > > But this really is an rpcbind bug. > > -- > Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one. > Hi Bjoern, I can confirm it now works again without editing the /etc/netconfig file, should we leave the p.r. open for reference to the rpcbind problem? Thanks, Rob Evers -- A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?