Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:30:16 -0800 From: Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> To: "Edwin L. Culp W." <edwinlculp@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HAL's demise Message-ID: <AANLkTikSB3xBEmvqJ4yOcUtcnh5nTPAFj4WhFr%2Bvuac5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin38nugrcr%2BrX5O%2BJnOTSw4f3KNQAscBwfyM9FX@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110224102357.15af921c@scorpio> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102240855430.76303@wonkity.com> <AANLkTin38nugrcr%2BrX5O%2BJnOTSw4f3KNQAscBwfyM9FX@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Edwin L. Culp W. <edwinlculp@gmail.com> w= rote: > Sounded like a good idea to me but ;) > > pkg_deinstall hal-0.5.14_12 > ---> =A0Deinstalling 'hal-0.5.14_12' > pkg_delete: package 'hal-0.5.14_12' is required by these other packages That list is recursive - kdelibs4 depends on hal, then other stuff depends on it. If it could be configured to work without hal, most likely the rest of the list would be just fine. --=20 Rob Farmer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikSB3xBEmvqJ4yOcUtcnh5nTPAFj4WhFr%2Bvuac5>