From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Oct 12 17:53:35 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA02548 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 17:53:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat) Received: from hwcn.org (main.hwcn.org [199.212.94.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA02485 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 17:52:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@hwcn.org) Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hwcn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA18553; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 20:51:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id UAA20934; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 20:52:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 20:52:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: ac199@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca To: Terry Lambert cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , hoek@hwcn.org, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed. In-Reply-To: <199710130007.RAA02182@usr05.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 13 Oct 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > So would the combined annoyance of its existance copuled with the > annoyance of not shutting it up when it's possible to kludge it to > shut it up be enought to put it over the "do something significant > about it" threshold? > > How about combining both of those with discussions like this one? 8-) 8-) 8-). But then what would we spend our Thanksgiving weekends arguing over!? [dev]fs design? Ugh! Yuck! ;-) Naw, these discussions are counter-incentive. If you really wanted to add incentive, you'd be quiet and just agree! [Well, Thanksgiving weekend over here, anyways...] -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk