From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Fri Apr 28 19:11:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D398BD543BE for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 19:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: from connect.ultra-secure.de (connect.ultra-secure.de [88.198.71.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B696102E for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 19:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: (Haraka outbound); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 21:09:56 +0200 Authentication-Results: connect.ultra-secure.de; iprev=temperror; auth=pass (plain); spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ultra-secure.de Received-SPF: None (connect.ultra-secure.de: domain of ultra-secure.de does not designate 217.71.83.52 as permitted sender) receiver=connect.ultra-secure.de; identity=mailfrom; client-ip=217.71.83.52; helo=[192.168.1.200]; envelope-from= Received: from [192.168.1.200] (217-071-083-052.ip-tech.ch [217.71.83.52]) by connect.ultra-secure.de (Haraka/2.6.2-toaster) with ESMTPSA id 30C9A93B-DFDC-4A39-B412-B638B2213FC2.1 envelope-from (authenticated bits=0) (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA verify=NO); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 21:09:54 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: poudriere suggestions From: Rainer Duffner In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 21:09:51 +0200 Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4E32A700-BD92-4BF1-A0C4-A7269123A827@ultra-secure.de> References: <20170428144150.4db646cc@rsbsd> To: "Russell L. Carter" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Haraka-GeoIP: EU, CH, 451km X-Haraka-ASN: 24951 X-Haraka-GeoIP-Received: X-Haraka-ASN: 24951 217.71.80.0/20 X-Haraka-ASN-CYMRU: asn=24951 net=217.71.80.0/20 country=CH assignor=ripencc date=2003-08-07 X-Haraka-p0f: os="Mac OS X " link_type="DSL" distance=14 total_conn=1 shared_ip=N X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on spamassassin X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Haraka-Karma: score: 6, good: 2881, bad: 1, connections: 3285, history: 2880, asn_score: 422, asn_connections: 430, asn_good: 422, asn_bad: 0, pass:asn, asn_all_good, relaying Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 19:11:10 -0000 > Am 28.04.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Russell L. Carter : >=20 > There is a tension between the (mostly) single-threaded ports and > the monsters like libreoffice, chromium, webkit-*, firefox, and > llvm*.=20 So, it=E2=80=99s not possible to speed up the build of libreoffice by = parallelizing it? I only build a 2000-ish subset of ports - and libreoffice (together with = webkit-gtk2) takes more time than anything else. Or rather, these take more time than the rest, combined. I=E2=80=99ve got a 2x6 core Xeon and 64GB RAM.=20=