From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 06:36:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D3F1065670; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.server1.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [82.193.243.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B3F8FC1B; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (HSI-KBW-091-089-161-008.hsi2.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [91.89.161.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server1.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D83757E884; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F9649F7.70509@bsdforen.de> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:36:39 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120424 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: office@FreeBSD.org References: <4F964605.4000002@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <4F964605.4000002@bsdforen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libreoffice-3.5.2_1 tinderbox failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:36:41 -0000 On 24/04/2012 08:19, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On RELENG_8 and RELENG_9 tinderbox doesn't see the dependency on > lang/clang. s/RELENG_9/RELENG_7/ -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?