From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 20 16:41:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4347416A49E; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA16443E2B; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408F76087; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:39:15 +0400 (MSD) Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFD05E7B; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:37:08 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from ru@localhost) by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) id k8KGbAoZ028187; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:37:10 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:37:10 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Maksim Yevmenkin Message-ID: <20060920163710.GA28144@rambler-co.ru> References: <20060919203608.GE23360@rambler-co.ru> <20060919215605.GB44298@rambler-co.ru> <20060919221404.GT94944@alchemy.franken.de> <20060920055715.GA81843@rambler-co.ru> <20060920121017.GU94944@alchemy.franken.de> <20060920122830.GB982@rambler-co.ru> <20060920162105.GC9976@rambler-co.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Marius Strobl Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/kbdmux kbdmux.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:41:20 -0000 On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:28:46AM -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > On 9/20/06, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >Here's another demo that indicates that sparc64 doesn't work > >properly. In this case it's a CONS_SETKBD ioctl which is used > >by kbdcontrol(8). I "kldload vkbd" and make sure two vkbd > >instances exist, /dev/vkbdctl0 and /dev/vkbdctl1. > > [...] > > actually, i just tracked this down as part of my work on pr > sparc64/96798. there are few problems mentioned in this pr. kbdcontrol > -k not working is just one of them. > > basically, kb_index is wrong, and, in my case, is always 0. which > defaults to first keyboard (i.e. subkbd(4)). that is why i can not use > kbdcontrol -k to switch between sunkbd(4) and, say, ukbd(4). > Yes, this is the endianness bug we were talking about. Hold on, the fix is almost ready. :-) Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer