Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:32:09 +0000 From: gpf@FreeBSD.org To: svn-soc-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: socsvn commit: r237259 - soc2012/gpf/pefs_kmod/sys/fs/pefs Message-ID: <20120607113209.BB349106566B@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: gpf Date: Thu Jun 7 11:32:09 2012 New Revision: 237259 URL: http://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/socsvn/?view=rev&rev=237259 Log: -get rid of the xxx comment Modified: soc2012/gpf/pefs_kmod/sys/fs/pefs/pefs_vnops.c Modified: soc2012/gpf/pefs_kmod/sys/fs/pefs/pefs_vnops.c ============================================================================== --- soc2012/gpf/pefs_kmod/sys/fs/pefs/pefs_vnops.c Thu Jun 7 11:30:17 2012 (r237258) +++ soc2012/gpf/pefs_kmod/sys/fs/pefs/pefs_vnops.c Thu Jun 7 11:32:09 2012 (r237259) @@ -2618,10 +2618,6 @@ cn.cn_pnbuf = NULL; cn.cn_consume = 0; - /* - * XXXgpf: if lookup succeeds, it should(?) raise reference count for svp - * by one, therefore a vrele is needed before we return? For both svp & lvp? - */ error = pefs_lookup(&la); if (error != 0) { printf("pefs_ioctl: PEFS_GETSLINKCTEXT lookup error %d", error);
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120607113209.BB349106566B>