From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 28 01:23:36 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA24996 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 01:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from maui.com (root@waena.mrtc.maui.com [199.4.33.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA24990 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 01:23:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from caliban.dihelix.com (caliban.dihelix.com [199.4.33.251]) by maui.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA17636; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 23:28:37 -1000 Received: (from root@localhost) by caliban.dihelix.com (8.7.4/8.6.9) id XAA01126; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 23:23:27 -1000 (HST) Message-Id: <199602280923.XAA01126@caliban.dihelix.com> Subject: Re: Quake's out, where's that Linux ELF emulation? To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 23:23:26 -1000 (HST) From: "David Langford" Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1391.825491881@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Feb 27, 96 11:18:01 pm From: "David Langford" X-blank-line: This space intentionaly left blank. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 ME8b] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Just being curious, but why was the SGI port of doom done? No complaint on that- it gives me something to do with ours :) ID is one thing but if there is a company to go after right now, it looks like it should be Caldera. >From the looks of things they may single-handedly make Linux the MS-DOS of the '90s (*sigh*) >> Gosh, >> >> Can we send out 2000 mail messages to iD?? > >Ack, no, please don't! Look, seriously, I've talked to the >_developers_ of this friggin' software and they've made it more than >abundantly plain to me, on multiple occasions, that they are NEVER, >EVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES going to do a port to FreeBSD and the >matter is not even open to discussion. The only reason we see a "free >UNIX" port of IDs stuff at all is because they happen to be unabashed >Linux fanatics there, and they have zero, zip nada interest in a >FreeBSD port. > >If you want Dave Taylor to publically state same in this mailing list >before you'll believe it, I'm also fairly sure it could be arranged. >He's certainly not been shy about making all of the above clear to me, >and pestering them with a letter-bombing campaign would have exactly >the opposite effect of what I suspect you'd like to achieve. > > Jordan >