From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Jan 15 09:45:34 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA14373 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:45:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA14366 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:45:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost (billf@localhost) by jade.chc-chimes.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA12671; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 12:47:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 12:47:07 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/9500: `edithook' is not Y2K compliant In-Reply-To: <199901151040.CAA01240@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > This should really be > > $today = sprintf("%d/%02d/%02d", $year + 1900, $mon+1, $mday); > > ie. yyyy/mm/dd, not mm/dd/yyyy > > Any objections to changing the log date format thus? Yes. What is your foundation for the new format? Perhaps this is just my American citizenship coming through, but mm/dd/yyyy is the way most people read dates. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message