From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jan 30 17:44:28 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA18438
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:44:28 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA18427
          for <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:44:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from grog@lemis.com)
Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137])
	by allegro.lemis.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA28178;
	Sat, 31 Jan 1998 12:14:13 +1030 (CST)
Received: (from grog@localhost)
          by freebie.lemis.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id MAA03029;
          Sat, 31 Jan 1998 12:14:13 +1030 (CST)
          (envelope-from grog)
Message-ID: <19980131121413.28219@lemis.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 12:14:13 +1030
From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
Cc: FreeBSD current users <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: LFS is nuked?
References: <19980130234945.43035@klemm.gtn.com> <199801310004.RAA13451@usr05.primenet.com> <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <19980131023641.18792@follo.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84e
In-Reply-To: <19980131023641.18792@follo.net>; from Eivind Eklund on Sat, Jan 31, 1998 at 02:36:41AM +0100
Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia
Phone: +61-8-8388-8286
Fax: +61-8-8388-8725
Mobile: +61-41-739-7062
WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe current"

On Sat, Jan 31, 1998 at 02:36:41AM +0100, Eivind Eklund wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 1998 at 08:08:32PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>> <<On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 00:04:04 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> said:
>>
>>> Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's
>>> bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and
>>> X.25 code have all been fixed...
>>
>> But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to
>> real users.
>
> Hey!  I'm probably going to have to either revive X.25 or drop a project, as
> TCP/IP over the ISDN D-channel is supposedly implemented encapsulated in
> X.25.

Are you sure you're not confusing it with X.75?  I've never heard of
X.25 being used at that level.  And though X.75 encapsulation is
available for ISDN, it's by no means the preferred method.  Raw HDLC
is much more efficient.

Greg