From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Mar 31  1: 0: 5 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D9137B874
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 01:00:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id BAA70642;
	Fri, 31 Mar 2000 01:00:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 01:00:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200003310900.BAA70642@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Subject: Re: bin/17694: wcstombs() and mbstowcs() unable to handle NULL
 argument
Reply-To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR bin/17694; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= <mikko@dynas.se>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/17694: wcstombs() and mbstowcs() unable to handle NULL
 argument
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:13:27 +1000 (EST)

 On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, [ISO-8859-1] Mikko Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi wrote:
 
 > <whine>
 > But everybody else has it...
 > </whine>
 >=20
 > Seriously, though: I have not been able to find *any* other
 > implementation that does not support this behaviour (HP-UX, AIX, Irix,
 > Solaris and Linux/RH6.1).  They must have gotten the idea *somewhere*...
 
 It doesn't seem to be in glibc-2.1.1 either.
 
 Bruce
 
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message