From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 14 07:51:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CCB16A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw.dgrp.sk (mailgw.dgrp.sk [195.28.127.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC96A43D58 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:51:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from koren@tempest.sk) Received: by mailgw.dgrp.sk (Postfix, from userid 1003) id E0E3D4FD83; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:51:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from domino1.tempest.sk (unknown [195.28.100.38]) by mailgw.dgrp.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B0B4FD9E; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:51:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lk106.tempest.sk ([195.28.109.36]) by domino1.tempest.sk (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.1IF1) with ESMTP id 2004041416515362-1294 ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:51:53 +0200 Received: from lk106.tempest.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lk106.tempest.sk (8.12.10/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i3EEplBp069191; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:51:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from koren@lk106.tempest.sk) Received: (from koren@localhost) by lk106.tempest.sk (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i3EEpjJH069188; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:51:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from koren) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:51:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200404141451.i3EEpjJH069188@lk106.tempest.sk> From: Ludo Koren To: tscrum@aaawebsolution.com In-reply-to: <004e01c4221d$12e96c60$6466a8c0@wolf> (tscrum@aaawebsolution.com) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Domino1/DGRP(Release 6.5.1IF1|March 16, 2004) at 14.04.2004 16:51:53,at 14.04.2004 16:51:55, Serialize complete at 14.04.2004 16:51:55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on mailgw X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61 X-Spam-Level: cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limiting bandwith X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:51:58 -0000 > I do not believe there is a way to "postpone" traffic with > dummynet other than what is available with queues, not to > mention I don't think you'd ever want to, really. The config > below will give mail a lower priority to all of the other > traffic, both in and out. > Nat interactive addresses? Hmmm... you mean you want ipfw to > forward local addresses using nat? you want to dole out local > ip addresses, dhcp? Not really sure of the question here, but > I'm sure its answered by following the link below to the > freebsd handbook. I wrote `interactive' (ticks), and I meant addresses that are used to connect to ssh, web, etc (interactive processes). All these addresses are NAT-ed. For these, your setup is working fine. Thank you very much. The problem, I still have, is the following: the SMTP is flowing through, I am not relaying e-mail on this host. It seems to me, I cannot put together a rule which pass the traffic and add it to the queue except when I use keep-state flag. In this setup (keep-state), Luigi wrote it does not work. Regards, lk