From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 13:31:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B268016A41B for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from natial.ongs.co.jp (natial.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E88B13C448 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from parancell.ongs.co.jp (dullmdaler.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.62]) by natial.ongs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E0E244C3A; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:58:37 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <46F905FD.9060208@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:58:37 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Masanori OZAWA Subject: The safety expansion for FreeBSD rm(1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:31:10 -0000 Hi Guys again Today is not unionfs. Introduction for safety expansion of rm(1). I know that some unix folks have a experience that you remove some files or directories accidentally. Yes, me too. LoL Have you any dreams that rm(1) autonomously judges target should be remove or not? To complexify system base command is objectionable behavior but adding some little and simple mechanism to prevent a issue is acceptable I suppose. We have created safety expansion for rm(1). If you have any interests, please try follow patch. http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/safety-rm/ Thanks :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi