Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:17:16 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217046] net/ceph-devel: Development version for Ceph, a distributed object, block, and file storage platform Message-ID: <bug-217046-13-vNgYE19AOt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-217046-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-217046-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217046 --- Comment #4 from Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> --- Hi Alan, Why have portlint, if you are way much more useful in suggestions? ;-) Thanx for the very detailed review. I will address your questions/suggestion and more. The port started out with a different approach so some things are left over. And next to that it is a work in progress, as is the Ceph-port. So some things are there as a reminder for future things to do. Otehr thigns are there because the "just seemed to work". Even with the por= ts handbook I still feel writing a ports fileset is sort of a black art. And yes, it took me a while to get this portset cooked up. And yes it runs thru both portlint and poudriere. poudriere testport complains mainly about work/stage containing all kinds of different files that the ceph install puts there but are mostly used for testing. And I do not want to compilcate the ceph part of the port even more with messing in the install things. If too much time left over, I'll perhaps spend a odd weekend to sort this out.=20=20 I might need some hand holding, but I'll checkout reviews.freebsd.org. And as to your question what is working/tested in the port: Mon OSD RadosGW rados rbd init-ceph, and etc/rc.d/ceph on top of that ceph-disk {prepare, activate} So all in all enough to build a multi server, multi osd cluster fully runni= ng on FreeBSD and do some testing... I still need to write up some notes on that. Somethings are still left to the user. :) I have not tried MDS, but would expect that not to be anything harder that getting MONs and OSDs ported. There is also the (lib)cephfs that needs attention. And my personal interest is in getting RBD working with bhyve. --WjW --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-217046-13-vNgYE19AOt>