From owner-freebsd-qa Thu Jul 25 13:27:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0D437B400 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail16.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389F443E70 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:27:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 5891 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2002 20:27:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) by mail16.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 25 Jul 2002 20:27:49 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6PKRmuR040323; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:27:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.2 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20020725191018.GB62517@sunbay.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:27:58 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Ruslan Ermilov Subject: Re: Update for 4.6.1 issues Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , "Brian J. McGovern" , re@FreeBSD.org, qa@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 25-Jul-2002 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 10:06:37PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 02:52:48PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >> > >> > On 25-Jul-2002 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 11:27:30AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: >> > >> If memory serves me right, "Brian J. McGovern" wrote: >> > >> > Is the examples issue a problem with CVS not checking them out? Or is it an >> > >> > issue of the release process not doing the right thing? I can't do the first >> > >> > (no commit privs), but I can look at the second over this coming weekend if >> > >> > we think its a release process issue. >> > >> >> > >> It's a release process problem, I think. I thought that Ruslan (CC-ed) >> > >> committed a fix for this problem to HEAD, but I don't know what the MFC >> > >> status is. Maybe he can shed a little light on this? >> > >> >> > > This was fixed in: >> > > >> > > bsd.subdir.mk,v 1.44 (5.0-CURRENT) >> > > bsd.subdir.mk,v 1.30.2.2 (4.6-STABLE) >> > > >> > > A work-around for RELENG_4_6 (if it's wanted) is to replace the bsd.subdir.mk >> > > by bsd.prog.mk in share/examples/Makefile: >> > >> > How big is the real fix? I personally wouldn't mind the workaround, but if >> > the fix isn't too big I'd rather just do it right to begin with. >> > >> Quite big and not worth the effort IMHO, as it's not security-related. >> Let's don't pollute the security branches with the non-security stuff. >> > Better commit the kludge to RELENG_4_*'s bsd.lib.mk so that ports > affected could still be built on these branches. (This fixes the > bug where the missing LIB= would result in bsd.lib.mk attempting > to build/install lib.a and lib_p.a.) Is this in RELENG_4 as well? Did we have this bug in 4.6-REL? -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message