Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 02:36:18 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, utisoft@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/167566 Message-ID: <20121028.023618.349364330842833865.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201210252030.q9PKU1sK001139@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201210252030.q9PKU1sK001139@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Sun_Oct_28_02_36_18_2012_307)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote in <201210252030.q9PKU1sK001139@freefall.freebsd.org>: ut> The following reply was made to PR conf/167566; it has been noted by GNATS. ut> ut> From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> ut> To: bug-followup@freebsd.org ut> Cc: ut> Subject: Re: conf/167566 ut> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:24:51 +0100 ut> ut> The correct fix would be to add REQUIRE: natd to ipfw. ut> ut> http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/167566.diff ut> ut> Please would someone take a look? I think ipdivert module should be loaded in the ipfw script when natd_enable=YES because ipfw_nat is loaded in that way. Can you (or anyone) test the patch at http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/ipfw.20121027-1.diff ? -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Oct_28_02_36_18_2012_307)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlCMG5IACgkQTyzT2CeTzy0v9gCdHFnKCwDRCQat2L4z5ELU24da 2bYAoKD9NiWBhjxO275FiOGREwlY6ve9 =je1f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Oct_28_02_36_18_2012_307)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121028.023618.349364330842833865.hrs>