From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 23 21:26:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEB2106566B for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from mailgw.es.net (mail1.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:201:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E718FC0C for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:910::29]) by mailgw.es.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3NLQqVL026944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:52 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 0294B1CC0F; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:52 -0700 (PDT) To: Andrew Reilly In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:44:15 +1000." <20100423034415.GA40833@duncan.reilly.home> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:51 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20100423212652.0294B1CC0F@ptavv.es.net> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2010-04-23_10:2010-02-06, 2010-04-23, 2010-04-23 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1004230158 Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: openssl problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:26:59 -0000 > Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:44:15 +1000 > From: Andrew Reilly > Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:03:23PM -0500, Paul Dokas wrote: > > Is anyone else having problems with ports that depend on openssl? > > Yes :-) > > I'm not sure if it's related, but I'm also having problems > related to configure vs Kerberos, which I suspect are of a > similar ports vs base issue. (evolution-data-server seems to > die on that one. aah: you're seeing that one too.) > > How am I dealing with it? Not well, yet. Currently rebuilding > everything that depends on openssl in ports, which does seem to > be making some progress, apart from the kerberos-related config > problems mentioned... I am seeing the problem building evolution-data-server. I was blaming my use of WITHOUT_OPENSSH in src.conf, but it looks like it might be more general. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751