From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Feb 24 13:28:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from guild.plethora.net (guild.plethora.net [205.166.146.8])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3337037B65D
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 13:28:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from seebs@guild.plethora.net)
Received: from guild.plethora.net (seebs@localhost.plethora.net [127.0.0.1])
	by guild.plethora.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1OLS2619633
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:28:03 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <200102242128.f1OLS2619633@guild.plethora.net>
From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach)
Reply-To: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach)
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 24 Feb 2001 22:27:04 +0100."
             <9820.983050024@critter> 
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:28:02 -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <9820.983050024@critter>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
>I think there is a language thing you don't understand here.

No, I just disagree.  It is useful for the OS to provide a hook for
memory which is *known to work* - and that is the environment C specifies.

-s

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message