From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 09:30:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDC71065698 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0EF8FC59 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7H9U7L5088112 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:30:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7H9U74K088109; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:30:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:30:07 GMT Message-Id: <200908170930.n7H9U74K088109@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Hannes Cc: Subject: Re: ports/137851: [patch] ports-mgmt/kports-qt4 - missing dependency X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hannes List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:30:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/137851; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Hannes To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/137851: [patch] ports-mgmt/kports-qt4 - missing dependency Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:52:33 +0200 Am Sonntag, 16. August 2009 19:50:14 schrieb Edwin Groothuis: > Maintainer of ports-mgmt/kports-qt4, > > Please note that PR ports/137851 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/137851 Sure, go ahead.