From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 09:28:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E534BDF; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312018FC0C; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA20849; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:28:27 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1TbT58-000Gji-T2; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:28:26 +0200 Message-ID: <50ADF03A.3090005@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:28:26 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Wills Subject: Re: current sluggish under load in the last few weeks References: <50ADA01A.7080805@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50ADA01A.7080805@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:28:30 -0000 on 22/11/2012 05:46 Steve Wills said the following: > Hi All, > > Has something changed in the scheduler recently? I don't have anything > concrete, I'd recommend getting something concrete first. Like doing some profiling. Or obtaining some ktr(4) traces that could be used with schedgraph. > just anecdotal evidence, but my current desktop feels a little > less responsive under heavy CPU load than it did a few weeks ago. > Usually my high CPU processes (builds) are nice'd, but even with that, > thing still get kinda sluggish, for example the mouse pointer will take > it's time responding. Didn't do that a few weeks back. Wondering if it's > just me? -- Andriy Gapon