From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 16 18:54:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337DA341 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@FreeBSD.org) Received: from m2.gritton.org (gritton.org [199.192.164.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13EE824D7 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from guppy.corp.verio.net (fw.oremut02.us.wh.verio.net [198.65.168.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by m2.gritton.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8GIs6GQ011049; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:54:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jamie@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <523753C9.9070302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:54:01 -0600 From: Jamie Gritton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130807 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= Subject: Re: jail configuration References: <8661u2kppt.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130916130543.GA73887@zxy.spb.ru> <86k3igki36.fsf@nine.des.no> <52370AD3.2060909@FreeBSD.org> <868uywk6y8.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <868uywk6y8.fsf@nine.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, Slawa Olhovchenkov X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:54:11 -0000 On 09/16/13 11:33, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Jamie Gritton writes: >> Yes, I've let jail startup go for too long - I really meant to put it in >> for 10.0 but the recent slush kind of surprised me (which means I'm just >> not keeping up). After 10 splits off, it's time to just do it. > > How about we just ask agree on a patch, then ask re@? If they're good for it, I am. But if it's to go in for 10, I'd think that update script would need to be a part of it. On the rc script itself, jail(8) has the ability to take multiple jails on the command line and start them all. I'd prefer to go that route rather than looping through the jails in the shell, since it allows for jail's support of dependencies and parallel startup. - Jamie