From owner-freebsd-arch  Thu Nov  7 13: 6:14 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C332637B401; Thu,  7 Nov 2002 13:06:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E9CDA43E6E; Thu,  7 Nov 2002 13:06:12 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gA7L5eOr004260;
	Thu, 7 Nov 2002 22:05:41 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com>
Cc: "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG,
	"Long,     Scott" <Scott_Long@adaptec.com>, re@FreeBSD.ORG,
	"Murray Stokely" <murray@freebsdmall.com>
Subject: Re: Bluetooth code 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Nov 2002 12:54:24 PST."
             <031401c2869f$db71b720$52557f42@errno.com> 
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 22:05:40 +0100
Message-ID: <4259.1036703140@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <031401c2869f$db71b720$52557f42@errno.com>, "Sam Leffler" writes:
>I made a quick pass over this code.  It's not clear to me why this stuff is
>or should be dependent on netgraph.  The code looks to support a new
>protocol domain and sockets within that domain so it would seem possible for
>it to stand apart from netgraph.  A bluetooth implementation that was not
>tied to netgraph would be preferrable as freebsd users would get the
>benefits of additional (non-freebsd users) working with the code.
>
>Specific stuff:
>
>1. Why isn't btsockstat integrated into netstat?

Actually, isn't netstat(8) hairy enough as it is ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message